Program Details
Offers a faculty-led experiential learning opportunity for graduate students to further investigate their research topic in the designated country or region. Through exploring local resources, discussions and lectures with hosting institution faculty, meetings with experts in their field of research, and collaboration with other graduate students, students have an opportunity to enhance their global perspective. Students meet as a team with a specified organization or company and are expected to present their research findings to the ‘client’ and to each other.
What inspired you to create this course? To offer a short-term abroad experience to working adults who often have limited time or money to take a longer program but who know that international exposure is critical to their career now and in the future. What are the goals for this course? The field experience to compare, contrast and delve more deeply into issues within the country attended (i.e. health, gender, social media, economic development) and their own country and work experience. How does the course taught abroad contribute to the curricular goals of the home department? The university has stated goals for internationalization of the study body, of the curriculum and to offer as many different possibilities for the students to understand their role as global citizens. What challenges have you encountered in designing a course with an embedded study abroad component? The cost was our primary challenge. Many of our students are receiving financial aid or have, themselves, limited funds. How has the course developed over time, and why? If this course is new, do you anticipate any adjustments based on the pilot experience? For Academic Year 2012-13 and going forward, the course was given a new name and new designation — Interdisciplinary. The new name is: International Field Study Experience (former name: Critical Scholarly Investigation (CSI): On Location). The rationale for the change was multi-fold: The interdisciplinary designation makes the course more available as an elective to several graduate programs; the focus of the course is less obscure; and most importantly, it sets into motion a category for additional interdisciplinary courses. The location, Florence, and the essence of the course remain the same as in its launch year, July 2012. The course enters its 4th year in 2016 and is now housed in a villa outside of Florence. Do you believe that it is feasible to incorporate cultural learning into content courses abroad? If so, then how? Yes. The simple exposure to another country was integral to the students’ cultural learning. We included cultural readings before going overseas and then afterwards asked for reflections. Did you consult any resources on education abroad that were particularly helpful in designing this course? If so, please describe. Yes. We worked with our undergraduate international office and with educators on ground on location as well as with industry, NGO and multinational corporation representatives. Please describe your education abroad teaching style and philosophy. The objective was to give the students a wide berth of what they could study. The emphasis was on the field work so that they could meet, so to speak, the locals. The concept was to give them time to see the tourist sites but it was our work to show them as much of the day to day as possible. This was our philosophy. The major philosophy was to bring the students into direct contact with what they were not familiar. Does your approach to teaching change when you are teaching abroad? If so, how? No. Our teaching is fluid with the intent to make the experience enriching, academic, but also fun. What techniques or innovations do you apply when teaching overseas? The essence of the major assessment changed from requiring a significant research paper to development of an in-depth presentation to where in the third year of the program the students actually consult with an organization located in the Tuscany region. Have you noticed any differences about the level of material retention in courses with an embedded study abroad component vs. courses taught solely on the home campus? Several of the students received jobs because of their experience including one student who was hired by the US Department of State. How do you contextualize and debrief experiential learning? The reflections from the students were critical to the contextualization as well as our debrief. We also, quite frankly, watched students undergo the exciting ‘transformational educational experience’ while on location. How do you assess student learning in this course? Are there any assessment methods that are particular to study abroad? We gave the students a pre- and post- test for cultural sensitivity. It was a small sample but the results did yield changes in attitude. If you feel that you have valuable information to contribute to this project that is not addressed in the body of this survey, please elaborate here. Yes. Our students are all working professionals many of whom never had the opportunity to study abroad as undergraduates. This is a demographic that is often lost in conceptualizing and delivering study abroad experiences. We would be delighted to assist in researching this demographic further. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
July 2024
Categories
All
|
The Forum on Education Abroad is a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization recognized by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission as the Standards Development Organization for Education Abroad. The Forum on Education Abroad is hosted by its strategic partner, Dickinson College
© 2024 The Forum on Education Abroad. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 425, Warren, RI 02885 | Phone: (717) 245-1031 |
Search The Forum
Subscribe to Forum News
|